🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation and Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.